Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Dhakad, S. S.
- Effect of Mole Drain Spacing and Depths on the Growth Character and Yield of Soybean in Vertisols of MP
Abstract Views :194 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Krishi Vigyan Kendra (R.V.S.K.V.V.) Dhar M.P., IN
2 Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Division, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal M.P., IN
3 Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot M.P., IN
4 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturbagram, Indore M.P., IN
1 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Krishi Vigyan Kendra (R.V.S.K.V.V.) Dhar M.P., IN
2 Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Division, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal M.P., IN
3 Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot M.P., IN
4 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturbagram, Indore M.P., IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol 6, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 173–176Abstract
Effect of mole drain spacings and depths on the growth character of soybean was studied in the farmer's fields in Hoshangabad district of Madhya Pradesh. Mole drains were formed with a mole plough with a 75 mm bullet or expander diameter using a 75 hp wheeled tractor. The drains were formed at 2 m, 4 m, 6 m and 8 m spacing at an average depth of 0.4 m, 0.5 m and 0.6 m from ground surface. The average length of each lateral was 50 m and the tractor was operated with a speed of 0.80 kmph. The plant height, number of branches per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant and yield of soybean crop were highest in 2 m drain spacing followed by 4m, 6m, 8m and control plot in all selected depths.Keywords
Drainage, Mode Drains, Mole Drainage System, Soybean, Vertisols
- Influence of Seed-Cum-Fertilizer Drill Machine on the Growth Characters and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max L.) at Farmer's Fields
Abstract Views :311 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Forestry and Crop Improvement, Vol 5, No 2 (2014), Pagination: 68-72Abstract
Field demonstration was conducted during Kharif season 2012 to 2013 to study effect of seed-cum-fertilizer drill sowing machine for soybean crop at farmer's fields in tribal area in Dhar district of Madhya Pradesh. Soybean sown by seed-cum-fertilizer drill was found better in term of growth character (plant population, plant height, number of branches per plant and number of ischolar_main nodules per plant) and seed yield weight per plant, seed index, seed yield, straw yield and harvest index (%) comparison with simple seed drill sowing machine.Keywords
Soybean, Seed-Cum-Fertilizer Drill, Growth Character, Yield.References
- Bhatnagar, P.S. and Joshi, O.P (1999). Soybean in cropping systems in India, Integrated CropManagement Series, FAO, Rome, 3: 1-39.
- Bhushan, L., Ladha, J.K., Gupta, R.K., Singh, S., Padre, T. A., Sarawat, Y.S., Gathala, M. and Pathak, H. (2007). Saving of water and labour in rice-wheat system with no tillage and direct seeding technologies. Agron. J., 99 (5): 1288-1296.
- Choudhary, V.P. and Singh, B. (2002). Effect of zero, strip and conventional till system on performance of wheat. J. Agric. Engg., 39 (2): 27-31.
- Dransfield, P., Willatt, S.T. and Willis, A.H. (1964). Soil to implement reaction experienced with simple tines at various angle attack. J. Agric. Engg. Res., 9(3): 220-224.
- Erbach, D.C. (1982). Tillage for continuous com and com-soybean rotation. Trans. ASAE, 25 : 906-911.
- Gupta, R.K. and Rajput, R.P. (2001). Indigenous nutrient managementpractices in Madhya Pradesh. In: Indigenous Nutrient Management Practices: Wisdom Alive in India. (Eds.) Acharya, C.L., Ghosh, P.K. and Subba Rao, A. Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal (M.P.) INDIA.
- Gupta, R.K (2002). National resources conservation technologies for black clay soil region of peninsular India. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 50 (4) : 438-447.
- Gupta, V.K., Vig, A.C. and Singh, Ranjodh ( 1970). Influence of spacing, time of sowing and nitrogen fertilization on the yield of wheat. Indian J. Agron., 15:251-253.
- Hummel, J.W., Wax, L. M. and Siemens, J.C. (1985). Reduced tillage systems: How they compare. Agric. Engg., 66 : 18-19.
- Iqbal, N., Akbar, N., Ali, M., Sattar, M. and Ali, L. (2010). Effect of seed rate and Row spacing on yield and yield components of Wheat. J. Agric. Res., 48(2) : 151-156.
- Jat, L.N. and Singh, S.M (2003). Varietal suitability, productivity and profitability of wheat (Triticum species) intercrops and relay cropping under furrow-irrigated raised bed system. Indian J. Agric. Sci.,73(4):187-190
- Li, X. Y., Gong, J. D., Gao, Q. Z. and Li, F. R. ( 2001). Incorporation of ridge and furrow method of rainfall harvesting with mulching for crop production under semiarid conditions. Agric. Water Mgmt., 50 (3) : 173-183.
- Malik, A.U., Alias, M.Ahmad, Bukhsh, H.A. and Hussain, I. (2009). Effect of seed rates sown on different dates on wheat under Agro-ecological conditions of Dera Ghazi Khan. J. Anim. & Plant Sci.,19(3): 126-129.
- Malik, R. K., Yadav, A., Singh, S., Sardana, P. K., Gill, G., Hobbs P. R. and Bellinder, R. (2003). Herbicide resistance management and introduction of zero tillage in wheat in India. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. America, 43-55.
- Nagavallemma, K.P., Wani, S.P., Reddy, M.S. and Pathak, P. (2005). Effect of landform and soil depth on productivity of soybeanbased cropping systems and erosion losses in Vertic Inceptisols. Indian J. Soil Conser., 33(2): 132-136.
- Nimje, P.M., Agrawal, Vijay and Soni, R.D. (2003). Effect of planting density and improved seeding machinery on yield and economics of soybean (Glycine max). Indian J. Agron.,48 (4) : 301-304.
- Rajput, Mohammed Jamil, Tunio, Shamsuddin, Rajput, Mushtaque Ahmed and Rajput, Fazal Karim (1984). Effect of row and plant spacing on yield and yield components in soybean. Pakistan J. Agric. Res., 5 (2) : 83-87.
- Ralli, S. and Dhingra, K.K. (2003). Response of soybean to different planting methods. Annals Biol.,19(2): 151-155.
- Shrivastava, A.K., Deshmukh, C.S. and Jain, N. (2005). Design development and performance of T.D. rotavator cum seed drill under vertisol. Paper presented and published in the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, AAAE, AIT, Bangkok, pp. 5-9, 2005.
- Shukla, J.N., Chouhan, A.M. Dhaliwal, I.S. and Verma, S.R. (1987). Field evaluation of rotary blade till attachment for Direct sowing operation, J. Agric. Engg., 29 : 21-27.
- Shukla, L. N., Dhalwal, I. S. and Chauhan, A.M. (2001). Multiplication field performance of strip till drill on wheat crop. J. Agric. Engg., 38 (3): 35-39.
- Siemens, J.C.,Weher, J.A. and Thornborn ( 1965). Mechanics of soil influence by tillage. Trans. ASAE, 8(1): 1-7.
- Singh, P., Alagarswamy, G., Pathak, P., Wani, S.P., Hoogenboom, G. and Virmani, S.M. (1999). Soybean-chickpea rotation on Vertic Inceptisol: 1.Effect of soil depth and landform on light interception, water balance and crop yields. Field Crops Res., 63 : 211-224.
- Tomar, S.S., Tembe, G.P., Sharma, S.K., Bhadawia, U.P.S. and Tomar, V.S. (1996). Soil and water management. Improvement of physical conditions of black soils in Madhya Pradesh (JNKVV) 26-47pp.
- Tomar,V.S., Tomar, S.S. and Sharma, R.A (2007). Natural resource management options for Rainfed Vertisols and Associated Soils of India Crop Production in stress Environments: Genetic and management options (JNKVV) 387-406 pp.
- Verma, Mukesh (2008). Effect of land configurastions and seed rates on the growth and productivity of rainfed soybean grown in Vertisols. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, J.N. Agricultural University, Jabalpur, M.P. (INDIA).
- Impact of Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana With Reference to Credit Utilization for Agriculture Among the Beneficiaries of Rewa District
Abstract Views :515 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 489-493Abstract
The Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) is a major-self-employment and credit cum subsidy programme under implementation in the country and the scheme has been funded by the centre and the states govt. in the ratio of 75:25, respectively. The present study was conducted during 2006-07 in Rewa block in Rewa district Madhya Pradesh. The total sample for the study consisted of 120 beneficiaries of marginal and small farmers. The study concluded that the association of attributes like education, land holding, size of family, social participation, personal experience of credit utilization pattern, attitude towards credit utilization under SGSY programme, economic motivation, contact with development agencies and mass media was observed highly significant with increase in annual income of the beneficiaries. The co-efficient of multiple determinations (R2) indicated that only 83.03 per cent of variation in the annual income increased of the respondents could be explained due to 10 independent variables.Keywords
Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana, Agrilculture, BPL, Poverty Alleviation, Self Help Group.References
- Baghel, P.K.S. (2003). A study on impact of Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) with special reference to credit utilization for minor irrigation among the tribal farmers of Dewsar block of Sidhi district (M.P.) M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, M.P. (INDIA).
- Badodiya, S.K., Shakya, S.K. and Daipuriya O.P. (2008). A study on Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana reference to increase in annual income of swarozgaries. Bharatiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 3-4: 184-189.
- Garg, S.K., Badodiya, S.K., Daipuria, O.P. and Rawat, U. (2012). Impact of Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojna on poverty alleviation in Morar Block of Gwalior district. Indian Res. J.Extn. Edu., 1:189-191.
- GOI (2004). Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana Guidelines, Ministry of Rural Development, NEW DELHI, INDIA .
- Gupta, S.K. and Sadhu, A.N. (1995). IRDP in hill areas (a case study in J&K). J. Rural Develop., 14(1): 53-64.
- Meshram, Vishal, Pyasi, V.K. and Saxena, V.K. (2005). Impact of Swarna Jayanti Gram Swarozgar Yozana on beneficiaries of Mandla district, M.P. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 5 (2&3): 148-149.
- Mundra, S.N. (1992). Impact of TRYSEM amongst women beneficiaries. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 28: 50-65.
- Nagayach, U.N. (2007). A study on Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana with reference to credit utilization for dairy enterprise among the farmers of Lahar block of Bhind district (M.P.). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, J.N. Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, M.P. (INDIA).
- Tiwari, R.K. (1997). A study on factor influencing the adoption of improved animal husbandry practices by the farmers of Dharsiwa block in Raipur district of M.P. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, C.G. (INDIA).
- Exploring Livelihood Security through Enhancement of Soybean Production on Farmer's Field of Dhar District of M.P.
Abstract Views :211 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Dhar (M.P.), IN
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Dhar (M.P.), IN
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 13, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 101-106Abstract
Frontline demonstration (FLD) programme is an effective technology transfer tool for better technology adoption that bridges the yield gaps. Keeping in view of an effective extension approach of FLDs for dissemination of soybean technology were studied for 3 years during Kharif 2012-13 to 2014-15 by the KVK, Dhar district of Madhya Pradesh. An impact evaluation was based on the comparison of beneficiary and non-beneficiary respondents with reference to increase in knowledge level, extent of adoption of improved soybean production technologies, the yield gap analysis and economics were also measured. It was found that the level of knowledge of beneficiary farmers regarding different improved soybean production technologies was higher than non-beneficiary ranging from 2.00 MPS in field preparation to 30.00 MPS in seed inoculation with cultures. The overall significant difference was found in knowledge level of beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers. The adoption level of beneficiary farmers observed 58 per cent and only 28 per cent have accepted but not adopted the technology due to some situational constraints. It is also revealing that there was a wide yield gap between potential and demonstration yields due to technology and extension yield gaps. Extension yield gaps varied to the extent of 4.10 to 9.42q ha-1 while technology gap ranged from 3.98 to 7.81q ha-1. Improved technologies gave higher mean net return of Rs. 46802/- ha-1 with a benefit cost ratio 3.34 as compared to farmers practice (Rs. 27066/- ha-1 and benefit cost ratio 2.59). On an average technology index was observed 24.03 per cent, which shows good performance of technical interventions.Keywords
Front Line Demonstration, Yield, B:C, Economics, Extension Gap, Technological Gap, Technology Index, Rain Fed Agro-Ecosystem.References
- Ahirwar, R. F., Nahatkar, S.B. and Sharma, H.O. (2007). Profitability and input use efficiency in cultivation of soybean in Malwa Plateau of Madhya Pradesh. Soybean Res., 5: 43-49.
- Dixit, A.K., Tomar, D.S. and Saxena, Arvind (2009). Performance of soybean variety JS 95 60 under farm conditions in Malwa Plateaue of Madhya Pradesh. Soybean Res., 7: 64-72.
- Katare, Subhash, Pandey, S.K. and Mustafa, Mohmad (2011). Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Update, 6 : 5-7.
- Kumari, Vedna, Kumar, A., Kumar, A. and Bhateria, S. (2007). Demonstration-an effective tool for increasing the productivity of rape seed–mustard in Kangra district of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal J. Agric. Res., 33 (2): 257-261.
- Kumawat, S.R. (2008). Impact of frontline demonstration on adoption of improved caster production technology. Rajasthan J. Extn. Edu., 16 : 143-147.
- Lathwal, O.P. (2010). Evaluation of crop demonstrations on black gram in irrigated agro ecosystem. Annals Agric. Res., 31 (1&2) : 24-27.
- Mankar, D. M., Wankhade, P. P. and Kale, N. M. (2014). Socio- economic impact of improved soybean technology on farmers. Internat. J. Extn. Edu., 10 : 146-152.
- Meena, D. S., Ali, Mashiat, Baldev, Ram and Tetarwal, J.P. (2012). Impact of improved technology on soybean productivity in south eastern Rajasthan. Soybean Res., 10: 99-103.
- Meena, K.C. (2011). An impact assessment of frontline demonstrations (FLDs) on soybean growers. Rajasthan J. Extn. Edu., 19 : 133-138.
- Mitra, Biplab and Samajdar, T. (2010).Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Extn. Rev., 2 : 16 - 17.
- Mokidue, I., Mohanty, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011). Correlating growth, yield and adoption of urd bean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11 (2): 20-24.
- Raghuwanshi, S., Tiwari, Abha and Agrawal, S.K. (2014). Constraints in adoption of improved production technology by soybean growers. J.N.K.V.V. Res. J., 48 (2) : 217-219.
- Samui, S.K., Mitra, S., Roy, D.K., Manda, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut. J. Indian Society Costal Agric. Res., 18 (2): 180-183.
- Singh, Mamta, Dwivedi, A. P., Mishra, Anupam and Singh, S.R.K. (2015). Extent of adoption of improved soybean production practices in Sagar district of Madhya Pradesh. Soybean Res., 13(1): 65-71.
- Tiwari, B.K and Tripathi, P.N. (2014). Yield gap analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) through front line demonstration on farmer’s fields. J. Rural & Agric. Res., 14 (1): 5-6.
- Yadav, V. P. S. and Kumar, R. (2007). Boosting pulse production through front line demonstration : An innovative approach. Agril. Extn. Rev., 31: 31-37.
- SOPA (2013).The soybean processors association of India, Kharif, 2013. http/www.sopa.org /DATA/PRCROP Kharif, 2013 pdf.
- Effect of Seed Cum Fertilizer Drill on Growth Characters and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max L.) in Shajapur District of Madhya Pradesh
Abstract Views :243 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol 10, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 16-21Abstract
A field experiments was conducted during Kharif season 2014 to 2015 for soybean crop to assess seed-cum-fertilizer drill and simple seed drill. Seed-cum-fertilizer drill was found better in term of growth characters and yield of soybean in comparison with simple seed drill sowing machine. The net return is the best index of profitability of soybean crop and higher net return per ha of Rs. 25569 was recorded for soybean crop under seed cum fertilizer drill whereas lower net return per ha of Rs. 17188 was recorded under normal seed drill sowing.Keywords
Soybean, Seed-Cum-Fertilizer Drill, Growth Character, Yield.References
- Ali, M. and Behera, U.K. (2014). Tillage and weed management for improving productivity and nutrient uptake of soybean. Indian J. Weed Sci., 46 : 184-186.
- Choudhary, V.P. and Singh, B. (2002). Effect of zero, strip and conventional till system on performance of wheat. J. Agric. Engg., 39(2):27-31
- Devnani, R.S. (1989). Design manual for sowing equipment, RNAM, Regional office Philippines.pp 4-9
- Dixit, J., Gupta, R.S.R., Behe, V.P. and Singh, S. (2004). No-till seed cum fertilizer drill in wheat crop production after paddy harvesting, Ama, Agric. Mechanization Asia, Africa & Latin America, 35(1):19-26
- Dhakad, S.S. and Khedkar, N.S. (2014). Influence of seedcumfertilizer drill machine on the growth characters and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) at farmer’s fields. Internat. J. Forestry & Crop Improv., 5 (2) : 68-72
- Dwivedi, S.P., Ramana, R.S., Vadivelu, K.V., Navalgund, A. and Pande, A.B. (2006). Spatial distribution of rainy season fallows in Madhya Pradesh: Potential for increasing productivity and minimizing land degradation. SAT eJournal, An Open Access J. ICRISAT, 2(1) : 1-35.
- Fisher, Box Joan and Guinness Fisher, Gosset (1987). Small samples. Statistical Sci., 2 (1): 45–52.
- Jat, L.N. and Singh, S.M. (2003). Varietal suitability, productivity and profitability of wheat (Triticum species) intercrops and relay cropping under furrow-irrigated raised bed system. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 73(4):187-190
- Jain, M.P. and Dubey, A.K. (1998). Productivity and economic viability of soybean with respect to planting systems and cultivars in Vertisol. Crop Res., 16 :102-22.
- Jayapaul, P., Uthayakumar, B., Devasagayam, M.M., Pandit, B.J., Palchamy, A. and Balakrishanan, A. (1995). Effect of land configuration methods, irrigation regimes and soil moisture conservation amendments on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] yield and quality characters. Crop Res., 11 : 253-57.
- Kepner, R.A., Bainer, R. and Barger, E.L. (1987).Principles of farm machinery. 1st Indian Ed. CRS Publishers and Distributors, DELHI, INDIA.
- Martin, J.H. and Leonard, W.H.O. (1976).Principles of field crop production. 3rd Ed. The Macmillan Co., London, 1118.
- Muhammad, Amin, Khan, Muhammad Jamal, Jan, Muhammad Tariq and Tariq, Javaid Akhtar (2013). Response of wheat growth characteristics to various tillage practices and sowing methods under semi arid environment. Sarhad J. Agric., 29(4) : 529-535.
- Nimje, P.M., Agrawal, Vijay and Soni, R.D. (200 E3)f.fect of planting density and improved seeding machinery on yield and economics of soybean (Glycine max). Indian J. Agron., 48 (4) : 301-304.
- Patro, Hrusikesh, Md. Alim Abdul and Dash, Debiprasad (2014). Growth and productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) under different tillage and sowing methods in India. Appl. Biol. Res., 16 (2): 209 - 213.
- Raut, V.M., Taware, S.P. and Varghese, P. (2000). Comparison of different sowing methods in soybean. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 25 : 218-219.
- Rawat, S.N., Verma, M.R.,Goyal, S.K. and Dave, A.K. (2011). Cost economic evaluation of zero till ferti seed drill vs conventional method of sowing. Prog. Agric., 7(1/2):161-162.
- Smith,A.E. and Wilkes, L.H. (1977). Farm machinery and equipment. 6th Ed. Tata McGraw- Hill, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
- Shrivastava, A.K., Deshmukh, C.S. and Jain, N. (2005). Design development and performance of T.D. rotavator cum seed drill under vertisol. Paper presented and published in the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, AAAE, AIT, Bangkok pp. 5-9.
- Shukla, J.N., Chouhan, A.M., Dhaliwal, I.S. and Verma, S.R. (1987). Field evaluation of rotary blade till attachment for direct sowing operation. J. Agric. Engg., 29(1) : 21-27.
- Shukla, L.N., Dhalwal, I.S. and Chauhan, A.M. (2001). Multiplication field performance of strip till drill on wheat crop J. Agril. Engg., 38/3, 35-39, July-Sep. 2001.
- Tripathi, R.S., Raju, R. and Thimmappa, K. (2013). Impact of zero tillage on economics of wheat production in Haryana. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 26(1): 101- 108
- Tripathi, S.C. and Chauhan, D.S. (2000). Evaluation of fertilizer and seed rate in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different tillage conditions after transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). Indiall J. Agric. Sci., 70 (9): 574-576.
- Tisdall, J.M. and Hodgson, A.S. (1990). Ridge tillage in Australia: A review. Soil & Tillage Res., 18 : 127-44